All blog posts are copyrighted. Plagiarists run the risk of prosecution.



Showing posts with label Foreign Policy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Foreign Policy. Show all posts

April 15th Tea Party!

America, I just returned from the Texas Tea Party, and it was absolutely fantastic! It was empowering, enlightening, and just a total flow of optimism! Not optimism in the failed policies and politics of our corrupt Government. Optimism in that we had each other. All of us were joined together, as Americans. All of us were joined together as one. There were several thousand at the Tea Party I attended. 

There were as many as 20,000 protesters gathered in Atlanta. And there were over 2,000 Tea Parties that happened across the nation! The people have spoken, but Washington... are you listening??? It was wonderful going to one of these events, because you knew right away that you were not alone. 

There was an astounding sense of camaraderie, that I will certainly never forget. And now I know for sure, having witnessed this with my own eyes... that we surround them! Happy April 15th everyone. What is usually a very stressful and tough day for Americans, has now become a day of empowerment, togetherness and common sense. God bless America.  

Cuban Trade

Cuba is on it's last leg. In the 50 years that Cuba has been around, it's had the iron fisted rule of a ruthless despot who is tied with Kim Jong Il for the Nobel Prize in Evil, a cultural icon which not only kept it's own people filled with false hope for an imaginary utopia, but also inspired the rest of the world, and it's had it's mini-Cold War with the United States.


Recently, we've seen it all disapear. Raul Castro has replaced his brother Fidel, a person whom most people are not positive is still even alive. Although Raul is just as much a Communist autocrat born of a bloody revolution, it is unlikely that he will be able to replicate his brothers talent for torture, barbarity, and oppression. 


While college kids and some left over hippies my still wear the image of an insane butcher on their chest, Che's status as an inspiration for a generation of idealistic, drugged-up flower children is almost completely dead. He is seen as a man on a Gap t-shirt, and nothing more. While a student at Berkely in 1968 would have told you that Che overthrew the pig Batista is going to bring a worker's utopia to Latin America, a student at Berkely in 2008 possibly could have told you that he was a revolutionary in Cuba way back when. Cuba is viewed by the population as one of the last desperate failed states, and is not seen as a future paradise any more. 


And finally, President Obama has effectively brought an end to the mini-Cold War that has existed since the Cuban Government lost it's sponser when the Russian Socialist Soviet Republic fell in 1991. This has been done through Obama's proposal to losen the trade barriers, and allow greater tourism of the small Carribian island. 


Of course, if Raul wishes to keep his nation from becoming a real life Atlantis and sinking into the sea, he will accept at least some of the terms. No matter how insane the entire Cuban Government may be, they cannot ignore the fact that their country is starving and desperate. Their people, blind as they may be, are about as technologically advanced as a pack of chimpanzees. They are hungry. And they are desperate to escape. Raul cannot escape these facts, as much as he may try to. When the time comes to make his descision, he will almost certainly do what any ruler wishing to keep the French Revolution from repeating itself would do: accept. If he does not, it will signal the end of any hope for a bloodless (or even lightly bloody) transition into democracy. The only way that will be able to happen is if every Cuban citizen storms Havana and hauls out a guilottinne. 


However, Cuba's stance on the issue is not what most Americans are concerned about: the question for most of us is, should we open to a Communist nation, or keep our doors shut? The important thing to remember before a conclusion can be reached is the context: The trade barriers were erected to starve Cuba into willingness to transform into a democratic state. By some miracle of God, Cuba has been able to sustain itself long enough to keep itself from imploding. Obvioulsy, our plan hasn't worked. Is it time for a new strategy? Or should we just drop the mini-Cold War and let Cuba do what it wants to?


The answer is both. The key to turning Communist Cuba into Capitalist Cuba is to bring America there. Don't wait for Cuba to change, and don't wait for the Cubans to come to America. Let Americans go there, let companies build there, communicate, trade, cooperate. And the reason is not to show Cubans that we are “reasonable people” willing to work hand in hand with a communist state – it's to show the Cubans what Americans are like, and bring them to the point where they no longer just want to come to America -they want to Change Cuba. 

How can we bet on this happening? Why should we so recklessly hope that a 50 year old human rights violating failed state run by Asylum escapees would see us, and change?

Because it's happened before. 


Go across the world to China, and back to 1972. Richard Nixon is in office, and he's made a trip to the most unlikely of countries: Mao Zedong's China, comparable only to Hitler's Germany in it's total barbarity and degenerecy. Nixon's actions heard a chorus of criticisms from all ends of the political spectrum. Even staunch free trade libertarians decried the visit, claiming that the United States should not be negotiating with these countries. 


Stay in China, but fast forward 17 years. On June 4, 1989, several thousand students were slaughtered by the Chinese military for demanding democratic reforms. Richard Nixon had introduced one of the most steadfastly Communist nations in the world to democratic capitalism and western ideals, and within 17 years, it had taken hold. Almost everyone older than 12 remembers watching a nameless, faceless young man with a briefcase – or was it a schoolbag? - holding up a line of 36 tanks for half an hour, before being hauled away by plainclothes police. 


The point is that introducing democratic values to a communist nation will take hold with the people – it's happened before, and that makes it a safe bet. The only reason China managed to resist change was because it's military was a modern, advanced one controlled by a modern, advanced burocracy. Cuba would not be able to withstand an attack of it's own people. When the citizens see that their country is changing, that they no longer must run and hide, but have a chance to change their country from the inside, they willl seize it. And the government will fold or be brought down. I may have my problems with President Obama – but his actions toward Cuba, weather or not he realizes it, may prove to be the most important step in bringing democracy to Cuba we've ever taken.

Warlike acts?

Yesterday, ABC News and the Wall Street Journal reported that agents of China and Russia hacked into our national power grids and left behind software designed to drive those grids down. It's believed the spies were on a mission to map the U.S. electrical system and its controls, according to current and former U.S. security officials. No systems were disabled or driven down but were made susceptible to such action in the future, say during a time of war. To my way of thinking, these are acts of war. They have threatened our national security and placed us in a position of vulnerability. These software bombs need to be investigated and made a public issue. Russia and China need to be put on notice such acts won't be tolerated...but alas, such won't be the case.

Not surprising to me, the White House has been silent in response to this news. Our President is seen as a paper tiger with no claws. Instead of speaking as the leader of a world power, his appearance at the G20 summit makes him look more like Oliver Twist asking "please Sir, I want some more." He sticks his hand out meekly to Iran seeking friendship and promptly gets told where he can stuff it. Of course we know Iran is a puppet state for Russia and former Russian President, Vladimir Putin made it clear we are the enemy. Then there's China who holds the lions share of our debt with the power to collect. Their hands are so deep in our pockets, they can tell if our underwear is clean. Meanwhile Congress and the President create another crippling bailout so they can get their hands on control of the corporations and banks foolish enough to accept them.

China and Russia are not only betting on us to fail, they're working towards it. Once we collapse, all they have to do is cut our electrical power off, walk in hand in hand and divide us up like a pie. When the lights come back on, we'll be occupied by hostile, foreign forces. By now, some of you are thinking that I'm oversimplifying how easily we could be conquered. Consider this. Most of our active duty military is abroad. Our only military forces at home are the National Guard and the Coast Guard. Large numbers of the National Guard are currently in Iraq or Afghanistan. The Coast Guard isn't equipped for land warfare. Even if the Guardsmen were home, we have no guarantee our Government wouldn't cooperate with the invaders and send the National Guard against us.

The best bet we have going is the Supreme Court decision finally affirming our right as individuals to keep and bear arms. Despite what Liberals tell you, we who own firearms, are the unorganized Militia and the last line of national defense. Obama's current indecisiveness over how to handle the Somali pirates holding an American ship captain hostage leaves me with little confidence he'll handle this global act of espionage very well.

Comedian Robin Williams used to do a bit in his standup act portraying his idea of how Jimmy Carter would handle the outbreak of nuclear war. He looks at the audience and says, "Good evening ladies and gentlemen...you're on your own. Goodnight!" and proceeds to exit stage right. Perhaps Mr. Williams will turn out to be more Prophet than Comic although I sincerely hope not.

What is Non-Interventionism, and why should I care?

Non-Interventionism: "A foreign policy which holds that political rulers should avoid alliances with other nations, and avoid all wars not related to direct territorial self-defense." -Dictionary

Usually when we hear talk of the recent wars and skirmishes we've been in, common words used for their description are: "Fiasco", "Failure", or a "Flop". How many times have we the American people, heard similar phrases such as the ones below, when our latest wars are being described: "Unintended and unexpected consequences...", "Not what was planned...", "Regrettable collateral damage...", and so on. You've heard the rhetoric of our Government. You've heard its excuses.

And America, if you're like me, you look back at World War II and you think "What did we do so right then? What have we been doing now that's so wrong? How did that war unite the nation, and every war since then divide it? How come everyone agrees World War II was necessary, but not so much with every other war we've been involved in since?" These aren't outlandish questions by any stretch. World War II brought Americans together after tough economic depression. It helped us to renew and restore. World War II helped us to recognize once again, who we were and why we were. 

But you want to know what made World War II as successful and appropriate as it was? America was in terrible danger. There were enemies who blatantly shouted their hatred for individual liberty, and freedom-loving nations around the world. We Americans were certainly no exception to that hatred. With the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, and Nazi submarines terrorizing our seas, the US had every right to defend itself and the liberties it championed. That's what made World War II a just and honorable war. But after that, we became a different people. We no longer fought wars just to defend ourselves. Instead, we became world policeman.

You look at the Korean War or the Vietnam War. You look at the skirmish of Mogadishu, also known as the Black Hawk Down incident. These fights weren't for the defense and preservation of our liberties. Why could we not have let the Vietnamese and Koreans conduct their own wars and other affairs? If chaos had broken out in Korea, America wouldn't have been in any danger. And what about the Mogadishu incident of 1994? For those of you who aren't aware of that incident, it took place in the East African country of Somalia. Civil war and revolution broke out, and had torn that country to tatters. Was it unfortunate? Oh yes absolutely. Should we have it in our hearts to give to charities, helping those Somali families and children? You bet we should! But should we have risked the lives of our soldiers, to try and stop a fight that wasn't ours? Did the Somalian radicals pose any direct threat to us? No. 

Their weapons were primitive at best, and food was scarce in that country. They certainly didn't have the means, or even the desire, to harm America. But that didn't stop the US Government from forcing our soldiers to fight a war that wasn't ours to fight. The mission turned out to be disastrous and we took many casualties. Lots of our own soldiers were killed, and you know what? Before our intervention in Somalia, they didn't really care about who we were or what we were up to. We weren't really even a thought in their minds. But as soon as we intervened in a fight that wasn't our business... they not only knew about us, they hated us. So much to the point, that the Somali extremists' whole cause shifted from "Take control of the country." to "Fight the Americans!"

And to this day, Somalia is still a dangerous place for Americans to travel, whereas if we had not intervened, and had just let the conflict play itself out, things might not have been so dangerous. But why am I giving you all this history? Why is it important? Because our past is screaming at us, and it's high-time we listen. And what is it trying to say? It's saying this: Interventionism is killing us! Somewhere along the line, our Government's gotten this idea that since it's so big and powerful, it should go around the world somehow, and solve everybody's problems. 

Our world is a very dangerous place though. Dictators and evil regimes are inevitable. And that should break the heart of anyone who is human. But just because it's unfortunate, that doesn't mean we should try and be the world police. Not only does it cost us billions of taxpayer dollars, not only does it increase our debt already at $13 trillion, it's most importantly costing us precious American lives! These American soldiers of ours, have families and they have friends.

They have mothers and fathers, sons and daughters, spouses, girlfriends and boyfriends, they have life-long pets, they have brothers and sisters, and they have best friends. They are people! And they're selfless people, because they have given up their rights and their lives, to defend us and the people they love. That's why the troops do what they do. Ask any of them why they joined, and most of them will tell you, "To serve my country." or "To protect the people I love."

To defend. To help the nation. Do we really want to put their lives in jeopardy, to fight a dictator or regime that isn't of any danger to us? I don't think I'm over the top, when I say that life is sacred! Yet our government deploys our troops left and right to every country that has a problem. Bush was even considering at one point, sending our soldiers into Darfur, Sudan! Why? To stop genocide. Is genocide terrible? You bet it is! But couldn't the Sudanese people handle that themselves? Even if they couldn't, why should we send our soldiers over to try and fix their mess? 

Sudan wasn't a danger to us. If we would simply embrace Non-Interventionism, our men and women wouldn't be thrown into so much danger overseas. Because if we reinstated Non-Interventionism like we had in World War II, we would only go to war to defend ourselves, and to preserve our treasured freedoms and liberties. And not only would we be saving the precious lives of our soldiers, but it would also save us billions of dollars, which we could then use to pay off our national debt. Non-Interventionism would put more money in the pockets of Americans also, because our taxes wouldn't be so high for the sake of so much war spending

If all of our soldiers were right here at home, we wouldn't have to pay the high cost of all these wars, and as a result... the economy would soar and our debt would disappear. Not only this, but another wonderful bright side would be the fact that they are right here at home! At home with their mothers and fathers, at home with their sons and daughters, at home with their spouses, at home with their boyfriends and girlfriends, at home with their friends, etc. And they would only have to go off to war, if we were attacked or in danger. Oh the lives that would be saved! Not just the lives of our soldiers either.

The lives of innocent people in other countries, who die by the thousands, due to honest mistakes and mishaps during wartime. That would end. Non-Interventionism isn't a new concept, and in fact it's one we did have until after World War II. Not only is it not new, other countries have Non-Interventionism established as their foreign policy also. I'll give one as an example: Switzerland has long been known for its policy of defensively-armed neutrality. Which means that unless they're attacked, they don't fight needless wars, or assist others in fighting other wars. The result? 

A wonderful economy! In fact, many people from all around the world, bank and invest there. Have you heard of any recent wars in which the Swiss have been involved in? No. Not one. How many Swiss military lives, do you think their policy has saved? Tons! Such is the result of Non-Interventionism. So we see examples of how Non-Interventionism is working wonders for the nations that instate it. 

We once had it, but greediness, corruption, and special interest consumed our Government and as a result-- we're now $13 trillion in debt to other nations and organizations, and as a result our taxes are astronomical. We've lost nearly 600,000 military lives, due to our Government trying to world police, and that's not even counting the lives of innocent civilians. As a result, our outstanding servicemen are being killed daily, spouses are crying, parents are miserable, and a friend is lonely. For what? A tribal war that broke out in some unheard-of country? Soldiers want to fight for their families and their loved ones. They want to fight for a cause that affects America. And our foreign policy isn't granting them that
I'll close with the words of our Founding Fathers, since this blog is named after them. This is what they advised to future American generations: 

"Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations; entangling alliances with none." -Thomas Jefferson

"It is our true policy to steer clear of entangling alliances, with any portion of the foreign world." -George Washington in his farewell speech, 1796

Our Government has turned its back on the America we once were, and it's high-time that we the people do something about it.